Her Internal Conflict- A Response to "The Story of an Hour"

Kate Chopin's visionary short story walks you into a sense of reluctance and internal conflict within the mind of a woman torn by her social constraints-- all stemming from the death of a husband. "The Story of an Hour" weaves through the conflicted emotions of a woman living in the early stages of feminism. Now, this topic of feminism has always been quite interesting to me-- its origins, its historical impact, and how exactly has the feminist movement been received-- both from women and the world. Miss Mallard seems to be enthralled by the idea of pursuing and leading a more individualized life. 
Miss Mallard is at odds with how she is supposed to feel, how she's supposed to act in accordance to the expectations laid upon a widow. But her inner desire to be freed from that structured facade leads her to feel differently. The line we walk-- that is, the plot-- we witness Miss Mallard being exorcised out of that false preset by the wish and dream of being her own person. Her realization that the death of her husband meant absolute liberation from the sequestering that was marriage for a woman in her age, it processed physically like a liberation. My favorite line was "What could love, the unsolved mystery, count for in the face of this possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being!"

In such an early time in history, for a woman to hold such thoughts must of felt just as frightening as it might've felt exhilarating. I feel as though this story was an expression of how the idea of feminism must have been handled in the mind of a woman in that time. Although it can be quite true that even today there are woman who do not feel as though self-assertion is natural due to the societies they belong. To read this short story is to get a glimpse of what that brilliant taste of realization must feel like for a woman wanting liberation. 

Comments

  1. hey V it is me Miguel; after reading your blog i am left with more questions than answers, at first I thought we must be reading two different stories, i am so puzzled , i tried to answer as many of my questions as i can but i simply gave up, why not have the actual author answer them? (you, thanks) can you please clarify (read: answer) these questions, i am completely baffled ...
    1: you state "Miss Mallard is at odds with how she is supposed to feel, how she's supposed to act in accordance to the expectations laid upon a widow"
    my questions is 1 how? 1a how is she at odds exactly? 1b where are these expectations laid upon her as how she should act being recently converted from wife to widow?

    2: you state "But her inner desire to be freed from that structured facade leads her to feel differently"
    my questions here is 2 where? 2a where does it states she has a inner desire to be freed from a structured facade? 2b what structured facade exactly? 2c you said "leads her to feel differently" also, what did she feel at first? 2d and what does she feel now since it is different ?

    3: you state "Her realization that the death of her husband meant absolute liberation from the sequestering that was marriage for a woman in her age"
    my questions is 3 where did you get this information from ? (must be external sources because i did not get any of that from the story) 3a how was marriage a sequestering for a women in her age? 3b also, what age did you mean ? (literal age [43?], or time in history age [1800's?])

    4: you state "My favorite line was "What could love, the unsolved mystery, count for in the face of this possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being!""
    my questions here is 4 what does this line mean to you? 4a why was it your favorite line?

    5: you state " I feel as though this story was an expression of how the idea of feminism must have been handled in the mind of a woman in that time"
    my questions here is 5 how? 5a how did you get this expression from this story? 5b how is feminism related or even correlated to this story ?

    sorry if it is too many questions , i am just intrigued and baffled by your blog [thanks, expecting reply soon]

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello,

    I think you have some valid points pertaining to the story. However, I think I read the story in a different manner. My analysis of this story was that Mrs. Mallard knew of her heart trouble and forced herself to let her husband go. I didn't think she let him go because she was happy to do so, but more due to her being forced to do so. She knew she could not live without him and therefore she thought letting him go would be easier. I don't think Mrs. Mallard was using her husband's death to escape her marriage. In fact, I think she knew how sacred her marriage was and knew that nothing will ever compare to it. She was trying to save herself the heartache.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you both make comparing arguments on both cases; however I also feel in even though she was set to live a long live that meant being with her fellow wedded husband, who is to say she did not truly want this? from marring so young if cornered her. not knowing that their were more secret artifacts than marriage goes? maybe she may not have wanted her husband to have past. but entirely she might have felt a pot twist. how being by her self meant living again. trying new things. new people. requiring to understand herself from her former self. Growing up to be who she is now and what she can better offer herself and people around her. who is to say that she felt shallow and scared because maybe He needed Her. Who is to say? ... even so much that her darkness could as well been minor light in it all. maybe see wanting to be free again.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to “The Lesson”